America’s position on the global stage is more than a role—it’s a responsibility. For decades, the United States has led the world with a rare blend of economic power, military strength, and moral authority. But watching today’s policymakers, it’s clear some have forgotten this responsibility. The left, ever eager to “reimagine” American power, tends to argue that America should step back and apologize rather than lead from strength. But here’s the deal: a weak America on the global stage leaves a void that gets filled by bad actors—Russia, China, Iran, to name a few. America leading from the front isn’t just about asserting power; it’s about maintaining global stability.
Under weak leadership, the country’s foreign policy becomes little more than apologetic platitudes and concessions to appease international critics. The left would have Americans believe that “America First” is somehow synonymous with “isolationism.” In reality, though, an America that prioritizes its interests is far more effective in promoting global stability than one that tries to please everyone. The goal should be clear: use American power to influence global events in ways that benefit not only American citizens but also the broader world.
America’s allies have historically looked to the U.S. for security guarantees that only the world’s largest democracy and strongest military can provide. NATO, for instance, wouldn’t mean much if not backed by American resolve. What the left fails to recognize is that our strength ensures peace; a powerful America dissuades aggressors. But when America is seen as indecisive or weak, adversaries grow emboldened. Just look at what happened in Afghanistan. The chaotic withdrawal showcased a lack of preparation and resolve, leaving both our allies and enemies questioning America’s commitment. Countries like China watched the debacle unfold and, unsurprisingly, started making moves on Taiwan.
Historically, Democrats have preferred a more “hands-off” approach, claiming that America is better off “cooperating” with everyone—even the tyrants. The idea is that by offering olive branches, these countries will somehow come to love freedom. It’s the same feel-good mentality that says harsh words and “constructive dialogues” will deter aggressors. But anyone with a shred of common sense knows that despots respond to power, not poetry readings. History has shown that nations with weak foreign policies don’t stay in power for long.
And here’s the kicker: all this talk from the left about America needing to be a “global citizen” sounds noble, but it’s incredibly naïve. Nations like China and Russia don’t view power as something to be apologized for. They don’t care about being good global citizens; they care about expanding their influence and pushing their own agendas, often at the expense of freedom and human rights. A leader like Reagan understood this, which is why he was able to face down the Soviet Union and win the Cold War. As Reagan famously said, “Peace is not absence of conflict, it is the ability to handle conflict by peaceful means.” That strength-driven mindset is precisely what the left dismisses but is exactly what America needs.
What America should do on the global stage is straightforward: lead with strength, maintain powerful alliances, and assert its interests. America isn’t just another player in the global game; it’s the one that sets the rules and keeps the peace. A strong America discourages aggression and inspires our allies to strive for freedom. Without that leadership, the world quickly becomes a more dangerous place.
America’s role on the global stage is vital for both its own security and for global stability. By leading from strength rather than appeasement, America can ensure a safer world and protect its own interests. Those who view America’s strength as a threat or as something to apologize for simply don’t understand how the world works. Now more than ever, it’s time to reject the left’s weak-kneed approach to foreign policy and return to a strategy that prioritizes American strength.
