Half of all federal welfare funds sent to Minnesota since 2018 have been lost to fraud.

Half.

That’s $9 billion stolen from 14 programs. Autism services. Housing assistance. Child nutrition. Programs designed to help vulnerable Americans, looted by criminals who found out nobody was watching.

CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz went on the Alex Marlow Show and delivered a message to Tim Walz and every other governor enabling this theft:

“When you find fraud — and fraudsters are good at finding it — they’ll milk it for as long as they can. So you have to come down hard.”

The Trump administration is coming down hard. And Minnesota is about to feel it.

The $3 Million Program That Cost $400 Million

Dr. Oz explained one scheme that perfectly captures Minnesota’s fraud epidemic.

The autism services program was budgeted at $3 million per year.

Fraudsters stole $400 million from it.

How? Oz laid it out:

“They got parents of kids who did not have autism to lie and claim that their children did have autism. Then they had other parents get their kids or themselves trained up with this, you know, 40-hour fly-by-night course to be a so-called expert on this, and they would take the kids and babysit them. It’s one big scam.”

Fake diagnoses. Fake experts. Fake services. Real money — $400 million of it — flowing to criminals who then bought luxury cars, real estate in Nigeria and Somalia, and potentially funded terrorist organizations.

A program meant to help autistic children became a massive theft operation.

$822 Million in Documented Fraud — And Counting

The Department of Justice has documented $822 million in fraud from Minnesota programs:

• $300 million from Feeding Our Future
• $220 million from autism program fraud
• $302 million from Housing Stabilization Program

That’s just the documented amount. The actual losses are likely far higher.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph Thompson said it plainly at Thursday’s press conference: Half of $18 billion in federal funds supporting 14 Minnesota programs has been lost to fraud.

“People come from all over the world to steal millions from U.S. government Medicaid, housing, and other programs,” Thompson added.

Come from all over the world. Minnesota has become a destination for international fraud operations.

The “Rinse and Repeat” Strategy

Oz explained how the fraud metastasized:

“These accusations started several years ago on some of the earlier programs that during COVID were created to feed kids. When these folks found out that no one was watching, they began to take that same tactic and rinse and repeat it over and over again to defraud us in other areas.”

The Feeding Our Future scam proved the concept: Minnesota wasn’t monitoring anything. The money flowed freely. Nobody asked questions.

So the criminals expanded. Same tactics, new programs. Autism services. Housing assistance. Medicaid. Anything with federal money attached.

Fourteen different programs. Fourteen opportunities to steal. And Tim Walz’s administration apparently watching none of it.

“Fix This in 60 Days or Start Looking Under Your Couch”

Dr. Oz already put Walz on notice.

“If we’re unsatisfied with the state’s plans or cooperation, we’ll stop paying the federal share of these programs,” Oz wrote. “The message to Walz is clear: either fix this in 60 days or start looking under your couch for spare change, because we’re done footing the bill for your incompetence.”

That’s not diplomatic language. That’s a threat — and one Oz has the authority to execute.

CMS controls Medicaid funding. If Minnesota can’t demonstrate it’s stopping the fraud, federal dollars stop flowing. Let Walz explain to Minnesota voters why their programs are being cut because his administration couldn’t bother preventing theft.

Walz’s “Damage Control” Response

Facing federal pressure, Walz announced a “Director of Program Integrity” position.

One person. To fix billions in fraud across 14 programs.

This is damage control theater. Walz ignored warnings for years. His employees — 500 of them — accused him of “systematically retaliating against whistleblowers.” He did nothing while criminals looted every program they could find.

Now he creates one position and expects the feds to be satisfied?

Dr. Oz isn’t buying it. And the 60-day clock is ticking.

Where the Money Went

The stolen funds didn’t disappear. They bought:

• Real estate in Kenya
• Apartments in Nairobi
• Land in Turkey
• Mansions in Minneapolis
• Luxury cars
• Property in Nigeria and Somalia

Some of it allegedly went to al-Shabaab, the al-Qaeda-linked Somali terror group.

American taxpayer dollars, stolen from programs meant to help children and the homeless, funding terrorism overseas and luxury lifestyles for criminals.

That’s what Tim Walz allowed to happen on his watch.

“No One Was Watching the Till”

Oz’s diagnosis of the problem is damning:

“There are 14 of these different projects that Minnesota got permission from us to do some advanced work on, progressive work. It doesn’t seem like they’re able to monitor well the financial implications of these, so they’re getting taken for a ride, and no one seems to have been watching the till.”

Minnesota wanted permission for “progressive” programs. The federal government granted waivers. Minnesota then failed to monitor any of it.

The state asked for flexibility and used it to enable theft. They wanted credit for innovative programs while doing none of the oversight those programs required.

Programs That “Sound Great” — Until They’re Weaponized

Oz acknowledged that the underlying programs had good intentions:

“A person is homeless, get them a place to stay for a little bit when they leave the hospital. Help transport people without the opportunity to get to a clinic visit so they can get that care. Advanced ways of helping children with autism cope with life by giving them services. It all sounds great, doesn’t it?”

It does sound great. And that’s exactly what fraudsters exploit.

“But if you weaponize that by allowing unscrupulous people to get access to the kitty, they’ll take you for a ride.”

Good intentions don’t prevent theft. Oversight does. Minnesota had the intentions and none of the oversight.

The “Bigger Lesson” for Government

Oz said Minnesota should teach officials everywhere a lesson:

“When you find fraud — and fraudsters are good at finding it — they’ll milk it for as long as they can. So you have to come down hard.”

The fraud didn’t stop because nobody stopped it. Criminals found a vulnerability and exploited it until they got caught. In Minnesota’s case, that took years and cost billions.

Every state running federal programs should be asking: Are we Minnesota? Are criminals exploiting our systems while we look the other way?

The Trump administration is asking those questions. States that can’t answer them should expect the same treatment Walz is getting.

The Housing Program Is Already Shut Down

Oz already took action on the housing program:

“The fraud in the housing program, which I shut down, is undebatable. That’s just not going to happen anymore.”

$302 million stolen from housing assistance. Program terminated.

More shutdowns are coming if Minnesota can’t demonstrate it’s capable of basic financial oversight.

60 Days

Tim Walz has 60 days to fix a fraud problem that took years to build.

He has to demonstrate real oversight, not a single “Director of Program Integrity.” He has to show criminals are being prosecuted, not just investigated. He has to prove federal money is going where it’s supposed to go.

If he can’t — or won’t — federal funding gets cut.

Dr. Oz isn’t playing games. The Trump administration isn’t accepting excuses. And Minnesota’s billion-dollar fraud epidemic is finally getting the response it deserves.

“You have to come down hard.”

They are.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. stood in front of cameras recently and said what needed to be said.

“This is not medicine; it is malpractice.”

The HHS Secretary announced a new declaration banning sex-altering surgeries, hormone replacement therapy, and other irreversible procedures targeting children with gender dysphoria. No more taxpayer funding. No more looking the other way. Enforcement actions against medical institutions that profit off vulnerable kids.

The era of experimental child mutilation is over.

“We’re Done With Junk Science”

Kennedy didn’t hedge. He didn’t use careful bureaucratic language. He called it what it is:

“We’re done with junk science driven by ideological pursuits, not the well-being of children.”

For years, the medical establishment pretended “gender-affirming care” was settled science. Evidence-based. Best practices.

It was always ideology dressed up in a lab coat. And Kennedy just ripped the disguise off.

The same medical institutions that told us to trust the science on everything from COVID to nutrition were performing experimental surgeries on minors too young to vote, drive, or buy alcohol — but somehow old enough to permanently alter their bodies.

That ends now.

300,000 American Kids — Conditioned to Believe a Lie

Kennedy put a number on the tragedy:

“They betray the estimated 300,000 American youth ages 13 to 17 conditioned to believe that sex can be changed.”

Three hundred thousand children. Told by adults they trusted — doctors, therapists, teachers — that their discomfort with puberty means they were “born in the wrong body.”

Told that hormones would fix them. That surgery would complete them. That their parents were obstacles to their “authentic selves.”

Conditioned. That’s the right word. These kids didn’t come up with gender ideology on their own. They were taught it. By a system that profits from their confusion.

Chloe Cole Stood With Kennedy

The announcement included Chloe Cole — a de-transitioner who experienced the medical industry’s predatory practices firsthand.

Cole underwent a double mastectomy as a teenager. She was assured it would help. It didn’t. Now she speaks out about what was done to her.

“It’s not too late to accept the beautiful way God has created you,” she said during her remarks.

Her presence at the announcement matters. This isn’t abstract policy. Real children have been damaged. Real young women have lost body parts they can never get back. Real lives have been altered forever.

Cole is one of the lucky ones — she’s alive and speaking out. Others aren’t so fortunate.

“They Betrayed Their Hippocratic Oath”

Kennedy aimed directly at the medical establishment:

“They betrayed their Hippocratic Oath to ‘do no harm.’ So-called gender affirming care has inflicted lasting physical and psychological damage on vulnerable young people.”

Doctors are supposed to heal. They’re supposed to protect patients, especially children, from harm.

Instead, entire medical departments were built around convincing confused adolescents that permanent bodily alteration was the answer to their psychological distress.

Hospitals created “gender clinics” that fast-tracked kids onto puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones. Surgeons performed mastectomies on teenage girls. Pharmaceutical companies made billions.

All while hiding behind “affirming care” language that made questioning any of it seem bigoted.

Kennedy called it what it is: a betrayal of everything medicine is supposed to represent.

The Trump Administration Won’t Stand By

Kennedy made the administration’s position crystal clear:

“The Trump administration will not stand by while ideology, misinformation, and propaganda push vulnerable young people into decisions they cannot fully understand and that they can never reverse.”

This isn’t just about ending federal funding. It’s about changing the culture.

For years, anyone who questioned pediatric gender medicine was labeled a bigot. Politicians were afraid to touch the issue. Medical professionals who raised concerns were silenced.

The Trump administration is sending a different message: We see what you’re doing to children. We’re going to stop it. And we’re going to hold you accountable.

“Divine Worth in Every Person”

Kennedy’s framing was powerful:

“There is divine worth in every person, and it shines most brightly in our children. That worth commands us to protect them.”

This isn’t about hating anyone. It’s about recognizing that children are precious and vulnerable — and that adults have a responsibility to protect them from harm, including harm disguised as help.

A child confused about identity deserves compassion, therapy, and time. Not irreversible medical interventions that will affect them for the rest of their lives.

Kennedy is saying what most Americans believe: Kids deserve protection, not experimentation.

The Industry That Profited Off Confusion

Follow the money.

Gender clinics multiplied across the country. Pharmaceutical companies saw new markets. Surgeons built practices around these procedures. Hospitals created entire departments.

This wasn’t organic demand. This was manufactured. Social contagion spread through schools and social media. Medical institutions were ready to profit from the confusion they helped create.

Kennedy’s declaration attacks the financial incentive. Pull federal funding. Impose enforcement actions. Make it costly to perform these procedures on minors.

When the money dries up, watch how quickly “best practices” change.

Europe Already Figured This Out

While American medical institutions pushed full speed ahead, European countries pumped the brakes.

The UK shut down the Tavistock gender clinic after a damning review. Sweden and Finland restricted pediatric gender treatments. Countries that pioneered these interventions are now abandoning them.

They looked at the evidence — the lack of long-term studies, the high rates of regret, the serious side effects — and concluded that caution was warranted.

American medicine ignored all of it. Ideology trumped evidence. Until now.

Four Republicans Voted Against This

Four House Republicans voted against legislation banning these procedures.

Their names are worth remembering. When the vote came to protect children from experimental surgeries, they sided with the gender industry.

Every other Republican understood what was at stake. Those four didn’t — or didn’t care.

The Declaration’s Impact

Kennedy’s announcement has teeth:

• Bans sex-altering surgeries on minors
• Bans hormone replacement therapy for children with gender dysphoria
• Bans other irreversible procedures targeting minors
• Pulls federal funding from institutions performing these procedures
• Imposes enforcement actions on violators

Medical institutions that have made millions from pediatric gender procedures just got put on notice. The federal government is no longer a partner. It’s an adversary.

Protecting Kids From Decisions They Can’t Understand

Kennedy’s core point deserves repetition:

Children cannot fully understand the decisions they’re being pushed into. They cannot comprehend what it means to be sterile for life. They cannot grasp the permanence of surgical removal. They cannot foresee the regret that comes when the ideological fever breaks.

Adults are supposed to protect children from making irreversible mistakes. The gender industry did the opposite — it exploited children’s confusion for profit and ideology.

Kennedy is restoring the proper order: Adults protect children. Not the other way around.

“This Is Not Medicine; It Is Malpractice”

That line will be remembered.

RFK Jr. didn’t call it controversial. He didn’t call it debatable. He called it what it is: malpractice.

Doctors who performed these procedures on children violated their oath. Institutions that enabled them betrayed their mission. An industry that profited from children’s suffering deserves to be dismantled.

The Trump administration just started that process.

The era of experimental child mutilation is over. The reckoning is just beginning.

Twenty Democratic attorneys general just sued to block Trump’s $100,000 fee on H-1B visas.

Their argument? American employers desperately need “highly skilled” foreign workers. There’s a labor shortage. Universities can’t function without imported talent.

American tech workers who can’t find jobs have a response to that claim:

“That’s total bullshit.”

Meet the working-class Americans the Democratic Party left behind — and watch them explain exactly why they’re done with the “party of labor.”

The Cybersecurity Professional Who Can’t Get Hired

John works in cybersecurity in the Seattle area. Or at least, he’s trying to.

He’s been struggling to land a job for a year. A year. In one of America’s tech capitals. With skills that are supposedly in “critical shortage.”

His response to the Democratic lawsuit?

“This is liberal states itching to ‘stand up to Trump,’ married by convenience to the Indian lobby and Big Business.”

The Democrats claim universities face labor shortages. John says that’s “crap” and that American citizens could “easily” be hired for these positions.

But American citizens cost more. They have expectations. They can’t be sponsored and controlled the way visa holders can.

So companies import cheaper labor and Democrats sue to protect the pipeline.

“The Democratic Party Is Not the Party of Labor”

Kevin Lynn founded U.S. Tech Workers, an advocacy group for Americans displaced by foreign labor. He’s been watching this play out for years.

His assessment of Democrats claiming employers verify that foreign workers don’t hurt American wages:

“That’s total bullshit.”

Lynn explained how the “verification” actually works:

“Imagine you’re at the Department of Labor and you get over a quarter million Labor Condition Applications, and at the same time, according to the statute, you have only seven days to view that application. All they have time to do is make sure the Is are dotted and the Ts are crossed.”

There’s no real evaluation. No actual check that Americans aren’t being displaced. Just paperwork processed on a deadline.

“This definitely tells you the Democratic Party is not the party of labor,” Lynn said. “It’s obvious that the wealthy donor class are represented now by the Democratic Party.”

The Numbers Democrats Don’t Want You to See

Let’s look at who actually gets these visas.

India accounts for 72% of all H-1B recipients. Tech companies use nearly 70% of all H-1B petitions. The program is capped at 85,000 new visas annually — but there’s a lottery because demand from employers far exceeds the cap.

Why are employers so eager to use this program? The official answer is “highly specialized skills.”

The real answer is cheaper, more controllable labor.

H-1B workers are tied to their sponsoring employer. They can’t easily switch jobs. They can’t negotiate aggressively. They can’t push back on working conditions without risking their immigration status.

For employers, that’s not a bug. It’s the feature.

“Corporate Donors Versus the Worker Class”

Joseph is another tech worker struggling to find employment. He sees the lawsuit for what it is:

“This is about the corporate donor class versus the worker class. Corporate donors, the large billionaires and millionaires and people making a lot of money off globalization, don’t want it to end.”

He continued: “These corporations buy these politicians to bring in this cheap foreign labor, illegal and legal, to depress American wages. It’s a worker issue, not a MAGA issue.”

That last point matters. This isn’t about politics for these workers. It’s about survival.

They’re not looking for handouts. They’re not asking for special treatment. They just want a chance to compete fairly for jobs in their own country.

Democrats are suing to make sure that never happens.

The Chamber of Commerce and Democrats — United Against Workers

Notice who’s aligned against Trump’s H-1B fee.

Twenty Democratic attorneys general. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Elite universities. Big Tech.

On the other side: American workers who can’t find jobs.

The Chamber of Commerce — representing hundreds of thousands of employers — sued over the proclamation in October. They argue the $100,000 fee makes it “cost-prohibitive” for companies to utilize foreign labor.

That’s the point. If you can find an American to do the job, hire the American. The fee is supposed to ensure companies only import foreign workers when genuinely necessary.

But corporations don’t want “genuinely necessary.” They want cheap and controllable. And Democrats are going to court to protect that interest.

The Worker Who Left Tech Entirely

Riley didn’t just struggle to find tech work. He left the industry completely out of frustration.

His assessment of the H-1B program:

“The H-1B program was created in order to cheapen the value of tech labor. We’ve never had a shortage of tech labor in the United States, and so I don’t see the program continuing to be a good thing.”

Never had a shortage. Think about that.

Every time you hear “labor shortage” from a corporate spokesperson or Democratic attorney general, remember: American workers who actually work in these industries say there’s no shortage.

What there is: A shortage of workers willing to accept suppressed wages and poor conditions. A shortage of workers who can’t fight back. A shortage of workers corporations can control.

H-1B solves all those “shortages” — for employers.

Sean O’Brien and the Changing Political Landscape

The tech workers interviewed cited Teamsters president Sean O’Brien’s speech at the 2024 Republican National Convention as a pivotal moment.

The largest labor union on the continent. Its president addressing the GOP convention. Historical.

O’Brien has since forged closer ties with national Republicans. And working-class Americans are following.

“It’s a worker issue, not a MAGA issue,” Joseph emphasized.

Democrats used to be the party of working people. Now they’re the party of corporate donors who profit from cheap labor — legal and illegal.

Working Americans noticed the switch. They’re switching too.

Trump’s Response: Make It Cost Something

Trump’s $100,000 fee doesn’t ban H-1B visas. It makes them expensive.

If a company genuinely can’t find an American worker with the required skills, $100,000 is a cost of doing business. They’ll pay it.

But if a company is using H-1B to save money on labor — if an American could do the job but costs more — the fee changes the calculation.

White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers explained:

“President Trump promised to put American workers first, and his commonsense action on H-1B visas does just that by discouraging companies from spamming the system and driving down American wages.”

Companies that need specialized talent can still get it. Companies looking for cheap labor will have to look elsewhere — like the American workforce.

The Workers Who Spoke Up Are Afraid

Here’s a telling detail from the Daily Caller report:

All five tech workers who spoke wanted to remain anonymous “out of fear of reprisal from potential employers.”

Think about that. American citizens are afraid to publicly advocate for American workers because it might hurt their job prospects.

That’s how captured the system is. Speaking up for Americans makes you unhireable. Silence is the price of employment.

These workers risked even anonymous interviews to tell their story. They’re that frustrated. That desperate. That fed up.

Democrats Made Their Choice

Twenty state attorneys general could have sued over anything. They could have fought for workers’ rights, consumer protection, environmental causes.

They chose to fight for cheaper foreign labor.

That tells you everything about who the Democratic Party represents in 2025.

Not the tech worker in Seattle who can’t get hired. Not the programmer who left the industry in frustration. Not the cybersecurity professional stuck in a year-long job search.

The corporate donor class. Big Tech. Elite universities. The people who profit when American wages go down.

“The Democratic Party is not the party of labor.”

American workers figured that out. The rest of the country is catching on.

Whoopi Goldberg has thoughts about FBI Director Kash Patel.

“You put your dog in charge of the FBI, and they do a better job.”

This from a woman whose primary qualification is pretending to be a nun in movies from the 1990s. But sure, let’s hear her expert analysis on federal law enforcement leadership.

What’s actually revealing isn’t Whoopi’s insult. It’s what she and her co-hosts accidentally admitted while trying to attack Trump’s FBI pick.

The “Leaked Report” That Tells a Different Story

Co-host Sunny Hostin breathlessly cited a 115-page report leaked to the New York Post claiming Patel is “in over his head” and leading “a chronically underperforming agency that is now paralyzed by fear and plummeting morale.”

Let’s think about this for a moment.

Who wrote that report? FBI insiders. The same insiders who spent years weaponizing the agency against Trump. The same people who fabricated the Russia collusion hoax. The same officials who suppressed the Hunter Biden laptop story. The same leadership that raided Mar-a-Lago.

Those people are experiencing “plummeting morale” because Kash Patel is holding them accountable?

Good. That’s the point.

“Paralyzed by Fear” — Of What, Exactly?

Think about that phrase: “paralyzed by fear.”

The FBI spent four years terrorizing Trump supporters. They sent SWAT teams to arrest elderly pro-life activists. They infiltrated parent groups concerned about school boards. They classified traditional Catholics as potential terrorists.

Now FBI agents are experiencing fear? Because their new director might hold them accountable for misconduct?

Welcome to how the rest of America has felt dealing with your agency for years.

The “No Senior Law Enforcement Experience” Lie

Hostin claimed Patel has “no senior law enforcement experience” to lead the FBI.

This is simply false.

Patel served as Senior Director for Counterterrorism at the National Security Council. He was Deputy Assistant to the President. He worked as a terrorism prosecutor in the Justice Department’s National Security Division. He served on the House Intelligence Committee where he helped expose the Russia hoax.

He has extensive experience in counterterrorism, national security, and federal law enforcement operations. He just doesn’t have experience covering up FBI misconduct — which is apparently the “experience” that matters to The View.

What “Senior Experience” Actually Produced

Let’s look at what “senior law enforcement experience” gave us with previous FBI leadership.

James Comey: Leaked classified memos to the press, bungled the Clinton email investigation, and helped launch the Russia hoax.

Andrew McCabe: Fired for lying to investigators, referred for criminal prosecution (though never charged), and helped orchestrate surveillance of the Trump campaign.

Christopher Wray: Slow-walked document production to Congress, resisted oversight at every turn, and presided over the Mar-a-Lago raid.

That’s the “experience” Hostin wants. That’s the leadership model The View prefers. Credentialed insiders who protect the institution at the expense of the public it’s supposed to serve.

Whoopi’s Accidental Truth Bomb

Here’s the line that reveals everything:

“None of the people in charge know what the hell they’re doing. None of them know.”

She meant it as criticism of Trump’s appointees. But she accidentally described the entire federal bureaucracy under previous administrations.

For decades, credentialed “experts” have run these agencies into the ground. They’ve weaponized law enforcement. They’ve politicized intelligence. They’ve failed at their core missions while expanding their power.

Trump’s response? Put people in charge who will actually fix things rather than perpetuate the dysfunction.

That’s what terrifies The View. Not incompetence — accountability.

“We Can Vote People In and Out”

Whoopi closed with this:

“I just want to make sure that we know that we can vote people in and out. This is a thing.”

Yes, Whoopi. It is a thing. Americans voted. They chose Trump. Twice, actually — once in 2024 after watching exactly how the FBI behaved during his first term.

They voted knowing Kash Patel would likely lead the FBI. They voted knowing he would clean house. They voted because he would clean house.

Democracy worked. The View just doesn’t like the result.

The Real Reason They’re Panicking

Kash Patel represents something the permanent Washington establishment fears more than anything: genuine reform.

He knows where the bodies are buried. He exposed FBI misconduct during his time on the House Intelligence Committee. He has a list of people who need to be held accountable.

The “115-page report” from disgruntled insiders isn’t journalism. It’s self-preservation. People who abused their power are terrified that their new boss actually intends to do something about it.

Their morale is “plummeting” because they can’t operate with impunity anymore. Their agency is “paralyzed” because the old rules no longer apply.

That’s not a crisis. That’s the cure.

Whoopi Should Stick to Movies

Here’s a woman who defended Roman Polanski by claiming his rape of a 13-year-old “wasn’t rape-rape.”

Here’s a woman who thought the Holocaust wasn’t about race.

Here’s a woman whose qualifications for analyzing federal law enforcement consist entirely of playing pretend on camera.

And she’s lecturing America about who should run the FBI.

A dog would do a better job than her previous favorites — the ones who spied on a presidential campaign, lied to courts, and turned the FBI into the enforcement arm of the Democratic Party.

Kash Patel is cleaning up their mess. That’s why they’re howling.

A TikTok video is burning across social media right now.

In it, a Somali-American man sits comfortably at home — apparently not at work — and delivers this message to Americans:

“Thank you for working so hard so I can be home all day — free. I can use my EBT. Go to work for me, white boy, white girl! Yeah! Go to work for me, you fking white animals! Fking work for me. Yeah, you f**king work for me. And the U.S. government — they work for me. All of you work for me. Now go to work.”

That’s not a parody. That’s not taken out of context. That’s a man openly mocking the Americans whose tax dollars fund his lifestyle, calling them “animals” and declaring that they exist to serve him.

And the worst part? He’s not wrong about the system. He’s just saying out loud what the system actually does.

The Anti-White System Exposed

For years, anyone who questioned mass immigration from countries with no cultural connection to America was called a racist. Question the welfare statistics? Racist. Ask about assimilation? Racist. Wonder if importing hundreds of thousands of people from failed states serves American interests? Racist.

The response was always the same: “These are just people who want a better life. They want to contribute. They want to become Americans.”

This video says otherwise.

Somalian in the US mocks Americans:
‌
“You work all f*cking day… Thank you for working so hard so I can be home all day free. Go to work for me white boy… Go to work for me you f*cking white animals!”

WE WANT HIS IMMEDIATE ARREST AND DEPORTATION LIVESTREAMED PLEASE @Sec_Noem… pic.twitter.com/DprvgeX9mc

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) December 16, 2025

This isn’t a man grateful for the opportunity America provided. This isn’t someone working to build a life and give back to the country that took him in. This is someone who views Americans as “animals” who exist to fund his existence.

And he’s comfortable saying it publicly, on camera, with his face showing. Because he knows there are no consequences.

How Much of Minnesota’s Somali Community Is on Welfare?

Let’s talk about the numbers that make videos like this possible.

According to recent reports, 75 percent of Somali households in Minnesota are on some form of welfare. Nearly every Somali household with children receives government assistance.

The welfare fraud scandal — over a billion dollars stolen through Feeding Our Future and other schemes — was allegedly perpetrated largely by members of this community. Dozens have been charged. The FBI is investigating juror bribery. The money disappeared to fund everything from luxury cars to real estate in Africa.

And a congressman — Ilhan Omar — represents this community while promising Somali constituents that “the U.S. government will do what we ask.”

The man in this video isn’t an outlier. He’s the logical product of a system designed to import dependents rather than contributors.

“You Guys Stole This Land”

BlazeTV host Steve Deace shared his own experience with this dynamic.

Years ago, when he was a new Christian struggling with immigration issues, he let an illegal alien on his show — a student attending the University of Iowa.

The conversation was sympathetic until Deace asked a simple question: What do you say to Iowa parents whose children were denied university seats because the school gave them to illegal aliens instead?

The answer, Deace says, sounded a lot like that Somali video:

“You guys stole this land from the Injuns. It’s an illegitimate country. I don’t feel any guilt and remorse whatsoever. And you’ve been raping the Latin world and third world ever since. So, you owe me.”

That was Deace’s wake-up call. “I’m sitting there saying to myself during the break, ‘I just let these people work me over.’ That’ll never happen again.”

The “Compassion” That Created This Monster

How did we get here?

Decades of Christian and humanitarian groups pushing open borders without thinking through the consequences. Chamber of Commerce types wanting cheap labor. Politicians wanting future voters. Activists wanting to feel virtuous.

Nobody asked the hard questions. What happens when you import people from cultures that view Western generosity as weakness? What happens when you provide endless benefits with no expectation of assimilation or contribution? What happens when you tell immigrants they’re victims and Americans are oppressors?

You get videos like this one. You get a man openly mocking the “animals” who fund his lifestyle. You get contempt where there should be gratitude.

“We Have No Fear of You Whatsoever”

Deace nailed the underlying attitude:

“We will pee on you and tell you it’s raining. In fact, while we’re peeing on you and you know we’re peeing on you and you can smell the urine in the air, we’re going to keep just telling you it’s raining. We’re going to laugh at you because we have no fear of you whatsoever. None. We have no fear of your politicians.”

That’s exactly what this video represents. Total contempt. Zero fear.

This man knows nothing will happen to him. He can post this video, rack up views, and continue collecting benefits. The system protects him. The politicians enable him. The media will ignore it or defend him.

He’s right to have no fear. The system is designed to ensure he never faces consequences.

The Biblical Case for Borders That Christians Forgot

Deace makes a point that too many churches have ignored:

“Let’s open up the word of God and see what it actually says. And I’m reading Nehemiah. There’s mass deportations. They’re building walls. God is punishing his people for not keeping boundary stones. I think the first judgment after Noah’s flood is the Tower of Babel. And God’s like, ‘Nope, you guys do not get to come together as one nebulous, globalist glob.'”

The “compassionate” position on immigration that many Christians adopted isn’t actually biblical. It’s secular humanitarianism dressed up in religious language.

The Bible talks about treating foreigners fairly. It doesn’t say open your borders to anyone who wants in, fund their lifestyle indefinitely, and accept their contempt as the price of virtue.

This Video Should Be Shown to Every Politician

Every elected official who supports mass immigration from countries like Somalia should be required to watch this video.

Every advocate who pushes for more refugees should see what some of those refugees think of the Americans funding their lives.

Every voter should understand what billions of welfare dollars are actually buying — not grateful future Americans, but contemptuous dependents who view us as “animals” existing to serve them.

This isn’t all immigrants. This isn’t all Somalis. But it’s enough of them that the video went viral because it resonated. Because people have seen this attitude in their communities. Because the statistics on welfare dependence and fraud confirm what the video displays.

The System Is Working Exactly as Designed

Here’s the uncomfortable truth: The man in this video isn’t abusing the system. He’s using it exactly as it was designed to be used.

The system imports people. The system provides benefits. The system discourages assimilation. The system punishes anyone who asks questions.

The result? A man sitting at home, collecting EBT, making videos calling taxpayers “white animals” who exist to serve him.

He’s not the problem. He’s the symptom.

The problem is the system that made his lifestyle possible — and the politicians who created it, the activists who defend it, and the voters who tolerate it.

The Reckoning Is Coming

Videos like this are why Trump won. Why deportations are happening. Why the public mood has shifted so dramatically on immigration.

Americans are tired of being told they’re racist for noticing reality. They’re tired of funding people who despise them. They’re tired of being called “animals” by people they’re supporting.

The man in this video thought he was being edgy and provocative. What he actually did was crystallize why immigration enforcement matters — why borders matter, why vetting matters, why assimilation matters.

He showed America exactly what unlimited “compassion” without accountability produces.

And America is done with it.

Your television is watching you.

Every 500 milliseconds — twice per second — your TV is taking screenshots of whatever’s on your screen. It’s recording what you watch, when you watch it, and for how long. And it’s sending all that information back to the manufacturer.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton just filed lawsuits against Sony, Samsung, LG, Hisense, and TCL, accusing them of running what he calls “an uninvited, invisible digital invader” in tens of millions of American homes.

“When families buy a television, they don’t expect it to spy on them,” the lawsuit states. “They don’t expect their viewing habits packaged and auctioned to advertisers.”

And yet, that’s exactly what’s happening.

The Technology Hidden in Your Living Room

The tool is called Automated Content Recognition (ACR). It’s built into most smart TVs sold today.

Here’s how it works: The software continuously monitors what’s displayed on your screen. It captures images, identifies the content, and logs your viewing habits in real-time. Every show. Every movie. Every news broadcast. Every video game. Everything.

That data gets transmitted back to the TV manufacturer. Then it gets packaged and sold — to advertisers, to data brokers, to whoever’s willing to pay.

You didn’t consent to this. Most people don’t even know it’s happening.

Paxton’s lawsuits allege this data collection is happening “without the knowledge or consent of users.” The companies buried it in terms of service agreements nobody reads, or enabled it by default without clear disclosure.

Screenshots Every 500 Milliseconds — Including Your Private Information

Here’s where it gets genuinely alarming.

ACR doesn’t just identify TV shows. It takes screenshots of your entire display. Twice per second.

Think about what appears on your TV screen besides Netflix.

Video calls where you discuss private matters. Banking apps if you use your TV for financial management. Passwords you type when logging into streaming services. Personal photos if you display them on your screen. Medical information if you use health apps.

All of it, potentially captured and transmitted to companies that have no business seeing it.

Paxton emphasized the security risk: “The fundamental right to privacy will be protected in Texas because owning a television does not mean surrendering your personal information to Big Tech or foreign adversaries.”

Two of These Companies Have Chinese Communist Party Ties

That “foreign adversaries” line isn’t throwaway rhetoric.

Two of the five companies being sued — Hisense and TCL — have documented ties to the Chinese Communist Party.

Paxton was explicit about this concern: “Companies, especially those connected to the Chinese Communist Party, have no business illegally recording Americans’ devices inside their own homes.”

Think about the national security implications.

Chinese-linked companies have surveillance technology in millions of American homes. That technology can identify what news you watch, what political content you consume, what your viewing habits reveal about your beliefs and preferences.

That’s not just an advertising concern. That’s an intelligence goldmine for a hostile foreign power.

And Americans have been inviting this surveillance into their living rooms voluntarily, without any idea it was happening.

40 Million TVs Sold Every Year — 70% From These Brands

The scale of this problem is staggering.

Approximately 40 million televisions are sold in America every year. The five brands named in Paxton’s lawsuit — Sony, Samsung, LG, Hisense, and TCL — account for nearly 70 percent of what Americans buy.

That means the vast majority of new TVs entering American homes have this surveillance technology built in.

If you bought a smart TV in the last few years, there’s a good chance it’s tracking your viewing habits right now. Sending data to the manufacturer. Potentially exposing your private information.

And you probably agreed to it without knowing — buried somewhere in the 50-page terms of service that nobody reads before clicking “Accept.”

“Invasive, Deceptive, and Unlawful”

Paxton isn’t mincing words about how he views these practices.

“This conduct is invasive, deceptive, and unlawful.”

The lawsuits allege violations of Texas privacy laws, which require companies to obtain meaningful consent before collecting personal data. The argument is that hiding surveillance capabilities in fine print doesn’t constitute real consent.

If Texas prevails, the precedent could reshape how TV manufacturers operate nationwide. Other states with strong privacy laws might follow with their own actions.

The TV industry has been treating user data as a free resource — something they can harvest without meaningful permission and monetize however they want. These lawsuits challenge that entire model.

The Industry’s Defense Will Be Predictable

We can already guess how the TV companies will respond.

“Users agreed to our terms of service.” (Which nobody reads.)

“ACR technology provides benefits like personalized recommendations.” (That nobody asked for.)

“Users can opt out if they want to.” (If they can find the setting buried in seventeen menu layers.)

“We take privacy seriously and protect user data.” (While selling it to advertisers.)

These are the same defenses Big Tech always offers. They’ve worked in the past because nobody was paying attention.

Ken Paxton is paying attention. And he has subpoena power.

What You Can Do Right Now

If you own a smart TV, here’s the uncomfortable truth: It’s probably tracking you.

Most manufacturers include an option to disable ACR somewhere in the settings. Finding it isn’t easy — they don’t exactly advertise the surveillance they’re conducting — but it usually exists.

For Samsung: Settings > Privacy > Privacy Choices > Viewing Information Services (disable)

For LG: Settings > All Settings > General > Live Plus (disable)

For Sony, Hisense, and TCL: Similar options exist, though menus vary by model.

You can also disconnect your TV from the internet entirely if you use separate streaming devices. A “dumb” TV that only receives input from a Roku or Apple TV doesn’t have the same surveillance capabilities.

But you shouldn’t have to do any of this. You shouldn’t have to be a privacy expert to watch television without being monitored.

Texas Is Fighting Back — Will Anyone Else?

Ken Paxton has built a reputation for taking on Big Tech when other attorneys general won’t.

He’s sued Google, Facebook, and other major platforms over privacy violations and anticompetitive practices. He doesn’t back down from fights with companies that have deeper pockets than most countries.

These TV lawsuits follow the same pattern. Going after major manufacturers, alleging systemic privacy violations, seeking to establish precedents that protect consumers.

If Texas wins, other states will likely follow. If Texas loses, the TV surveillance continues — probably expanding as companies face no consequences for treating your living room as a data collection center.

Your TV Isn’t Just Entertainment Anymore

For most of human history, television was a one-way technology. Broadcasters sent signals out. You received them. The TV couldn’t see you.

That’s no longer true.

Your smart TV is a two-way surveillance device. It watches what you watch. It listens if voice controls are enabled. It transmits data about your behavior to companies and governments you’ve never heard of.

And until Ken Paxton filed these lawsuits, almost nobody was doing anything about it.

“Owning a television does not mean surrendering your personal information to Big Tech or foreign adversaries.”

That should be obvious. The fact that it needs to be litigated tells you everything about where we are.

The mainstream media thought they had JD Vance cornered.

Vanity Fair published a hit piece on White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, and buried in the article was a quote where Wiles apparently called Vance “a conspiracy theorist for a decade.”

No context. No explanation. Just the quote, dangling there like bait.

A reporter took that bait to Vance after his economic speech in Allentown, Pennsylvania, on Tuesday. Surely this would create tension. Surely Vance would be defensive. Surely there was a story here.

Instead, Vance turned the whole thing into a masterclass on how to handle gotcha journalism.

“A Conspiracy Theory Is Just Something That Was True Six Months Before the Media Admitted It”

Vance didn’t get defensive. He didn’t distance himself from Wiles. He didn’t take the bait at all.

Instead, he owned it — and flipped the script completely.

“At least on some of these conspiracy theories, it turns out that a conspiracy theory is just something that was true six months before the media admitted it.”

Then he started listing examples. And every single one landed.

The “Conspiracies” Vance Admitted To Believing

Here’s what Vance said he believed that supposedly made him a “conspiracy theorist”:

“I believed in the crazy conspiracy theory back in 2020 that it was stupid to mask 3-year-olds at the height of the Covid pandemic, that we should actually let them develop some language skills.”

That “conspiracy theory” is now mainstream science. Studies have confirmed that masking young children harmed language development and provided minimal protective benefit. But in 2020, saying it out loud got you banned from social media.

“I believed in this crazy conspiracy theory that the media and the government were covering up the fact that Joe Biden was clearly unable to do the job.”

That “conspiracy theory” became undeniable when Biden face-planted in the June 2024 debate and was forced out of the race weeks later. Everyone who’d been saying “Biden is sharp as a tack” suddenly admitted what was obvious for years.

“And I believed in the conspiracy theory that Joe Biden was trying to throw his political opponents in jail rather than win an argument against his political opponents.”

That “conspiracy theory” played out in courtrooms across America. Multiple prosecutions of Trump, timed perfectly to the election calendar, brought by prosecutors with Democratic ties. The lawfare campaign was real, documented, and ongoing.

Every single “conspiracy theory” Vance listed turned out to be true. The only question was timing.

The Wiles Quote Was Taken Out of Context — And Everyone Knew It

Here’s what the reporter didn’t mention: Wiles herself said the Vanity Fair piece was “a disingenuously framed hit piece” where “significant context was disregarded.”

Vance confirmed that the “conspiracy theorist” line was actually a running joke between him and Wiles — something they’d laughed about for months. Vanity Fair stripped that context to manufacture conflict.

This is what mainstream media does. Find a quote that sounds damaging. Remove all context. Present it as evidence of tension. Hope someone takes the bait.

Vance didn’t bite. He explained the joke, praised Wiles effusively, and noted that she would “never be one to work against Trump and his America First agenda.”

Story over. Narrative collapsed. Gotcha failed.

The Media’s “Feud” Obsession Keeps Backfiring

This isn’t the first time the press has tried to manufacture drama within Trump’s team.

CNN ran a story claiming Secretary of State Marco Rubio was “miffed” about being “overshadowed” by Middle East Envoy Steve Witkoff. Both men immediately shut it down.

Rubio’s response was brutal: “CNN is an anti-Trump gossip tabloid that uses thinly sourced stories to generate clicks and try to make trouble. Witkoff is one of the people I work with the CLOSEST on our team. These people are pathetic.”

Trump himself has debunked rumors about tension with RFK Jr. and other cabinet members. Every time the media tries this play, it fails — and makes them look petty and desperate.

You’d think they’d learn. But manufacturing conflict is all they have left.

“We Should Be Giving Fewer Interviews to Mainstream Media Outlets”

Vance ended his response with a pointed observation:

“If any of us have learned a lesson from that Vanity Fair article, I hope that the lesson is we should be giving fewer interviews to mainstream media outlets.”

He’s right. What’s the upside?

Vanity Fair got eleven months of access to Susie Wiles. They used it to produce a hit piece that stripped context, manufactured drama, and tried to damage the administration.

Why would anyone in Trump’s orbit cooperate with outlets whose explicit goal is to harm them? What possible benefit comes from giving interviews to reporters who will twist every word?

The mainstream media has burned every bridge. They’ve proven, repeatedly, that access will be weaponized. That good faith will be exploited. That context will be stripped to serve narratives.

Vance’s advice isn’t cynical. It’s practical. Stop feeding the beast that’s trying to destroy you.

The “Enemy of the People” Label Keeps Earning Itself

Trump has called the mainstream media “the enemy of the people.” Critics clutch pearls every time he says it.

But then you watch how they operate — the manufactured feuds, the stripped context, the gotcha questions designed to create division — and you realize it’s not hyperbole. It’s description.

The media’s job, as they see it, isn’t to inform the public. It’s to damage the administration. Every interview is an opportunity to find ammunition. Every quote is potential fodder for the next hit piece.

Vanity Fair spent eleven months with Susie Wiles and produced an article she called “disingenuous.” That’s not journalism. That’s opposition research with a press badge.

Vance Showed How It’s Done

The old playbook said you should engage with gotcha questions seriously. Defend yourself. Explain the context. Hope the reporter presents your response fairly.

That playbook assumed good faith from the media. It doesn’t exist anymore.

Vance’s approach is better. Own the accusation. Reframe it. Show why the “conspiracy theories” were actually correct. Make the reporter look foolish for asking.

“A conspiracy theory is just something that was true six months before the media admitted it.”

That’s not just a great line. It’s a complete reframing of how conservatives should handle these attacks.

Don’t apologize for being right early. Don’t let the media memory-hole their own failures. Remind everyone, every time, that the “misinformation” of yesterday is the admitted truth of today.

The mask mandates were wrong. Biden’s decline was real. The lawfare was happening.

JD Vance believed all of it before it was acceptable to say. That doesn’t make him a conspiracy theorist.

It makes him someone who was paying attention.

Mark Kelly made a video telling troops to disobey orders from their commander-in-chief.

Now the Department of War is conducting an official Command Investigation into “serious allegations of misconduct.”

And Kelly’s response? A press release dripping with fear disguised as defiance.

This is what accountability looks like when you forget that retired military officers are still subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

The Video That Started It All

Back in November, Kelly joined five other Democratic lawmakers in releasing a video explicitly calling on military service members and intelligence officials to “refuse illegal orders” from the Trump administration.

Not hypothetical illegal orders. Not orders that might someday be illegal. Orders from Trump — framed as presumptively unlawful simply because Trump gave them.

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth didn’t mince words. He called the group the “Seditious Six” and labeled the video “despicable, reckless, and false.”

“Encouraging our warriors to ignore the orders of their Commanders undermines every aspect of ‘good order and discipline.’ Their foolish screed sows doubt and confusion, which only puts our warriors in danger.”

The other five participants — Senators Slotkin, and Reps. Deluzio, Houlahan, Goodlander, and Crow — are former military but not retired. That distinction matters. They’re no longer subject to the UCMJ.

Mark Kelly is different. He’s a retired Navy Captain. He explicitly invoked his rank and military service in the video. And retired officers remain subject to military justice.

Kelly knew this. He did it anyway.

The Investigation Just Got Very Real

What started as a preliminary review has now escalated to an official Command Investigation.

The Department of War’s statement to Breitbart News was direct:

“Retired Captain Kelly is currently under investigation for serious allegations of misconduct. Further official comments will be limited to preserve the integrity of the proceedings.”

Command investigations aren’t slaps on the wrist. According to military law experts, they’re conducted when there are allegations of “misconduct, breaches of discipline, or criminal activities within the command.”

The potential consequences include recalling Kelly to active duty status to initiate court-martial proceedings or administrative measures.

That’s not a sternly worded letter. That’s a legal process that could end with real penalties — including, theoretically, loss of rank, benefits, or worse.

Kelly’s Response Reads Like a Man Who Just Realized He’s in Trouble

Kelly released a statement Monday night that tells you everything about his state of mind:

“It should send a shiver down the spine of every patriotic American that the president and secretary of defense would abuse their power to come after me or anyone this way.”

Translation: I didn’t think there would be consequences.

“It wasn’t enough for Donald Trump to say I should be hanged. It wasn’t enough for Pete Hegseth to threaten me with a court martial. Now they are threatening everything I fought and served for.”

Translation: I’m trying to make myself the victim here.

“If Trump and Hegseth think this will stop me from doing what I’ve done every day of my adult life—fighting for this country—then they’ve got the wrong guy.”

Translation: Please ignore that I’m lawyered up and terrified.

Kelly’s attorney already sent a preemptive letter to the Secretary of the Navy, warning that any proceeding would be “unconstitutional and an extraordinary abuse of power.”

When you’re threatening legal action before you’ve even been charged, you’re not confident in your position. You’re scared.

What Kelly Actually Did — And Why It Matters

Let’s be clear about what happened here.

A sitting United States Senator, invoking his military rank and service record, released a video telling active-duty troops to disobey orders from the elected president of the United States.

This isn’t about Kelly expressing political opposition. Senators do that every day. This is about a retired military officer using his rank to encourage insubordination in the armed forces.

The Uniform Code of Military Justice exists for a reason. Military discipline depends on a clear chain of command. When officers — even retired ones — tell troops to ignore their commanders, it undermines the entire system.

Kelly didn’t accidentally stumble into this. He deliberately wore his military credentials while encouraging what amounts to mutiny.

Hegseth’s characterization was accurate: “Kelly’s conduct brings discredit upon the armed forces and will be addressed appropriately.”

Trump’s “Death” Comments Were Hyperbole — Kelly’s Actions Were Real

Kelly and his defenders are trying to make this about Trump’s rhetoric rather than Kelly’s conduct.

Yes, Trump posted that “seditious behavior” is “punishable by DEATH” and reposted someone saying “Hang them George Washington would.”

Trump later clarified he wasn’t threatening to kill anyone: “I’m not threatening death, but I think they’re in serious trouble. In the old days, it was death.”

Hyperbolic? Sure. Inflammatory? Absolutely. That’s Trump.

But here’s the thing: Trump’s tweets don’t change what Kelly did. Kelly made a video calling on troops to disobey their commander-in-chief. That’s a serious act with serious implications — regardless of how Trump responds to it.

You don’t get to commit potential UCMJ violations and then claim victimhood because the president said mean things about you on social media.

Kelly’s Lawyer Is Already Playing Defense

Paul Fishman of Arnold & Porter sent a letter to the Secretary of the Navy before the investigation was even escalated, warning that any proceeding would be challenged.

“There is no legitimate basis for any type of proceeding against Senator Kelly, and any such effort would be unconstitutional and an extraordinary abuse of power.”

That’s a lot of preemptive lawyering for someone who supposedly did nothing wrong.

If Kelly’s conduct was perfectly legal and appropriate, why the panic? Why the threatening letters? Why the media campaign to paint himself as a victim of tyranny?

Because he knows he’s exposed. He knows retired officers are subject to UCMJ. He knows what he did could have consequences.

And he’s hoping that enough political pressure will make those consequences go away.

The Precedent Matters More Than Kelly

This isn’t just about one senator.

If Kelly walks away with no consequences, every retired officer in America learns the same lesson: You can use your military credentials to encourage insubordination, and nothing will happen.

That’s a dangerous precedent. The military depends on discipline. It depends on troops following lawful orders without every retired captain second-guessing the chain of command on cable news.

Kelly invoked his rank. He spoke directly to troops. He told them to disobey.

If that doesn’t warrant a Command Investigation, what does?

Kelly Wanted Attention. Now He Has It.

Mark Kelly made that video because he wanted headlines. He wanted to position himself as part of “the resistance.” He wanted clips for campaign ads showing him standing up to Trump.

Mission accomplished. He got his headlines.

Now he’s also got a Department of War investigation, potential court-martial proceedings, and a legal bill that’s probably growing by the hour.

Be careful what you wish for, Senator.

You spent 25 years in the Navy. You know the rules. You know retired officers remain subject to military justice. You invoked your rank while encouraging insubordination.

Now you get to find out what accountability feels like.

One hundred twenty-three political prisoners walked out of Belarusian detention this week. Americans among them. A Nobel Peace Prize laureate among them.

And it happened because Trump sent an envoy to sit across from a dictator and cut a deal.

No hostage payments. No pallets of cash. Just leverage, applied correctly.

The Breakthrough That Wasn’t Supposed to Happen

Belarus has been holding political prisoners for years. Dissidents. Journalists. Activists. Anyone who challenged Aleksandr Lukashenko’s iron grip on the country.

Among them: Ales Bialiatski, the 2022 Nobel Peace Prize winner. A human rights advocate who spent decades documenting abuses in Belarus. Lukashenko threw him in prison for it.

The Biden administration issued statements. Expressed concern. Called for releases. Achieved nothing.

Trump sent John Coale — his special envoy for Belarus — to Lukashenko’s palace in Minsk. Two days of meetings. Friday and Saturday.

By the weekend, 123 prisoners were free. Including American citizens.

That’s the difference between a president who talks and a president who delivers.

The Deal: Potash Sanctions Lifted

Nothing comes free in diplomacy, especially with dictators.

The price for the prisoner release? The U.S. agreed to lift sanctions on Belarusian potash exports. Potash is a key ingredient in fertilizer and one of Belarus’s major revenue sources. Sanctions had been strangling that trade.

Critics will howl. “Trump is rewarding a dictator! He’s giving Lukashenko what he wants!”

But here’s the reality: 123 people are free who weren’t free before. American citizens are coming home. A Nobel laureate is out of a cell. Families are being reunited.

What did the sanctions accomplish while they were in place? The prisoners stayed locked up. Lukashenko stayed in power. Belarus stayed aligned with Russia. The status quo achieved nothing except making us feel righteous.

Trump traded economic pressure for human lives. That’s not weakness. That’s prioritization.

Lukashenko Is a Thug — And Trump Dealt With Him Anyway

Let’s be clear about who Aleksandr Lukashenko is.

He’s been ruling Belarus since 1994. He rigged the 2020 election so blatantly that his own people rose up in protest — and he crushed them. Thousands were arrested. Many were tortured. Some disappeared.

He’s Putin’s closest ally. He let Russian forces stage from Belarusian territory for the Ukraine invasion. He’s as close to a puppet dictator as exists in Europe.

And Trump sat down with him anyway. Because that’s where the prisoners were.

You don’t negotiate hostage releases with nice people. You negotiate with the thugs holding the hostages. The morally pure approach — refusing to engage with bad actors — leaves Americans rotting in foreign prisons.

Trump understands this. His critics never will.

The Nobel Peace Prize Winner Is Finally Free

Ales Bialiatski founded the Viasna Human Rights Center in 1996. For nearly three decades, he documented political repression in Belarus. He tracked arrests. He supported prisoners’ families. He shined a light on abuses the regime wanted hidden.

The Nobel Committee gave him the Peace Prize in 2022 — while he was sitting in a Belarusian prison cell.

Lukashenko’s response to the Nobel announcement was to keep Bialiatski locked up even tighter. A message to the world: Your prizes mean nothing here.

This week, Bialiatski walked free. Not because of international pressure. Not because of UN resolutions. Because an American president decided getting him out was worth making a deal.

American Citizens Are Coming Home

The exact number of Americans among the 123 hasn’t been fully disclosed. But the reports confirm: U.S. citizens were part of this release.

These are people who’ve been languishing in Belarusian detention while their own government issued press releases and hoped for the best.

Their families aren’t thinking about potash sanctions right now. They’re thinking about hugging their loved ones for the first time in years. They’re thinking about the phone call that told them it was finally over.

That’s what matters. Not the diplomatic optics. Not the foreign policy debates. The people coming home.

Biden Had Four Years to Do This. He Didn’t.

The obvious question: Why didn’t this happen sooner?

Lukashenko has been holding these prisoners for years. The Biden administration was in office for four of those years. They had the same leverage available — sanctions relief in exchange for releases.

They chose not to use it. They chose moral posturing over results. They chose to keep sanctions in place and prisoners in cells.

Maybe they thought the sanctions would eventually break Lukashenko. Maybe they thought engagement would look like appeasement. Maybe they just didn’t prioritize it.

Whatever the reason, the result was clear: Nothing changed. Prisoners stayed imprisoned. Americans stayed detained. Ales Bialiatski stayed behind bars even after winning the Nobel Peace Prize.

Trump’s been in office less than a year. The prisoners are free.

This Is What “Peace Through Strength” Actually Looks Like

Critics of Trump’s foreign policy love to caricature it. “He just cozies up to dictators! He doesn’t care about human rights!”

Really? Because 123 political prisoners — including human rights activists — just walked out of detention because of Trump’s approach.

The strength isn’t in refusing to talk. The strength is in having enough leverage that when you do talk, you get results.

Trump met with Kim Jong Un. Critics screamed. North Korea stopped testing missiles for years.

Trump met with Putin. Critics screamed. Now there’s a potential deal on Ukraine that could end the war.

Trump sent an envoy to Lukashenko. Critics will scream. And 123 prisoners are free.

At some point, you have to judge approaches by their outcomes, not by how they make the foreign policy establishment feel.

The Prisoners Are What Matter

Somewhere today, a family is welcoming home someone they weren’t sure they’d ever see again.

Somewhere today, Ales Bialiatski is breathing free air for the first time in years — able to continue the human rights work that earned him a Nobel Prize.

Somewhere today, an American citizen who was rotting in a Belarusian prison is on their way back to U.S. soil.

That’s the story. That’s what matters.

Not the think-tank debates about whether we should have lifted potash sanctions. Not the hand-wringing about rewarding dictators. Not the partisan complaints from people who had four years to do this themselves and didn’t.

One hundred twenty-three people are free. Americans are coming home.

That’s called winning. And it’s what happens when you have a president who prioritizes results over posturing.

Two point five million.

That’s how many illegal aliens have left the United States since Trump took office in January. Some were deported. Most left on their own. All of them are no longer here.

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem dropped the numbers this week, and they’re staggering: 605,000 deportations. Nearly two million self-deportations. Close to 600,000 arrests.

This isn’t incremental progress. This is a sea change. This is what happens when a government actually enforces its own laws.

The Self-Deportation Strategy Is Working Better Than Anyone Predicted

Here’s the part that’s driving the open-borders crowd crazy.

The Trump administration didn’t just ramp up deportations — although they did that too. They created conditions where illegal aliens chose to leave on their own.

Almost two million people looked at the new enforcement environment and decided their best option was to go home voluntarily. Many used the DHS “CBP Home” app, which offers a free flight and a $1,000 stipend to leave.

That’s not cruelty. That’s efficiency. Every self-deportation is one less arrest, one less detention bed, one less court case, one less flight that ICE has to arrange.

The message from DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin was crystal clear: “Illegal aliens are hearing our message to leave now. They know if they don’t, we will find them, we will arrest them, and they will never return.”

That’s not ambiguity. That’s certainty. And certainty changes behavior.

Six Consecutive Months Without a Single Border Release — Let That Sink In

During the Biden years, DHS would release thousands of illegal aliens into the country per day. They’d get a court date years in the future, disappear into the interior, and never be seen again.

That’s over.

For six straight months, DHS has not released a single illegal alien from the southern border into the United States. Not one. Zero.

The “catch and release” policy that turned the border into a revolving door? Gone. The mass releases that dumped thousands of migrants into American cities without warning? Finished. The NGO pipeline that shuttled illegals from the border to your neighborhood? Shut down.

Six months of actual enforcement. Six months of consequences. Six months of a border that functions like a border.

Your Rent Is Going Down — And Immigration Enforcement Is Why

Here’s where this gets personal for every American struggling with housing costs.

HUD Secretary Scott Turner announced that rents have decreased for four consecutive months. Four months. After years of prices that made homeownership feel like a fantasy and renting feel like robbery.

The connection isn’t subtle. Economists in Denmark found that a one-percentage-point increase in immigration leads to roughly 6% higher rents and 11% higher home prices.

The Center for Immigration Studies found something even more direct: A 5-percentage-point increase in recent immigrants in a metro area correlates with a 12% increase in rent relative to income for American-born households.

In other words: More illegal immigration means higher housing costs for Americans. Less illegal immigration means lower housing costs for Americans.

This isn’t complicated. It’s supply and demand. When you add millions of people to a housing market without adding housing, prices go up. When those people leave, prices stabilize.

Vice President Vance put it simply: “The connection between illegal immigration and skyrocketing housing costs is as clear as day. We are proud to be moving in the right direction.”

The Majority of Deportees Had Criminal Records — Despite What the Media Claims

Every time ICE makes an arrest, the media rushes to find the most sympathetic possible angle. “Father of three detained!” “Worker picked up at job site!” “Community member removed!”

Here’s what Noem actually said: The majority of those deported are illegal aliens with pending criminal charges or criminal convictions.

Not valedictorians. Not doctors saving lives. Criminals. People who came here illegally and then committed additional crimes while here.

The system is prioritizing exactly what it should prioritize — removing people who pose a danger to American communities. The fact that the media frames this as controversial tells you everything about whose side they’re on.

The “They Can’t Deport Everyone” Crowd Just Got an Answer

For years, open-borders advocates had a favorite talking point: “You can’t deport 11 million people. It’s logistically impossible. Mass deportation is a fantasy.”

Two point five million in less than a year.

Not all deportations either. Most were people who saw the writing on the wall and left voluntarily. The enforcement pressure created the conditions for self-deportation at scale.

If this pace continues — and there’s no reason to think it won’t — we’re looking at millions more departures over the next three years. The “impossible” is happening in real time.

The people who said it couldn’t be done are watching it be done. Their only remaining argument is that it shouldn’t be done — which is a much harder sell to Americans who’ve been living with the consequences of open borders.

This Is What “America First” Immigration Policy Looks Like

The contrast with the previous administration couldn’t be starker.

Biden: Record illegal crossings, mass releases, sanctuary policies, overwhelmed cities, housing crisis.

Trump: Record enforcement, mass departures, zero releases, declining rents, secured border.

One approach prioritized the interests of people who broke the law to come here. The other prioritizes the interests of Americans — including legal immigrants who followed the rules.

That’s not xenophobia. That’s not cruelty. That’s a government doing its basic job: protecting its citizens and enforcing its laws.

“They Will Never Return” — The Policy That Makes This Permanent

There’s a line in the DHS statement that deserves attention: “They will never return.”

This administration isn’t just removing illegal aliens. It’s implementing policies to ensure they can’t come back. Lifetime bans. Enhanced screening. Biometric tracking. Consequences that actually deter.

The old system was a joke. Get deported, wait a few months, try again. Get caught again, get released again. Repeat until successful.

The new system means deportation is the end of the road. You don’t get another shot. You don’t get to try your luck. You’re done.

That changes the calculus for everyone thinking about crossing illegally. The risk-reward equation just tilted dramatically toward “not worth it.”

2.5 Million Down. More to Go.

This isn’t the finish line. It’s a milestone.

Millions of illegal aliens remain in the country. Sanctuary cities are still obstructing enforcement. Activist judges are still trying to slow things down.

But the trajectory is clear. The policy is working. The numbers don’t lie.

2.5 million illegal aliens have left the United States since January. Rents are falling. Communities are safer. The border is secure.

This is what winning looks like. And we’re just getting started.