Is the Supreme Court Ready to Amend its Decision on Roe v. Wade?

Now that former President Barack Obama’s liberal activists posing as impartial justices on the U.S. Supreme Court find themselves in the minority, it appears the monstrous Roe v Wade and other abortion decisions will be rolled back.

Former President Donald Trump placed three even-handed jurists to the high court that tipped the balance back in favor of “original intent” interpretations of the U.S. Constitution. The court’s willingness to take up a major abortion-related case now indicates a long-overdue amendment to precedent could be at hand.

Democrats and the fake news media have falsely claimed the U.S. Supreme Court created a right to abortion or, as they claim, “a woman’s right to choose.” What the court actually stated was that people have a right to privacy regarding medical decisions and the state’s interest in the fetus wasn’t powerful enough until viability outside the womb. Given such decisions are based on scientific data as far back as the 1970s, much has changed.

Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant signed a law that effectively banned most abortions after 15 weeks. Under the 1973 Roe v Wade standard, the state’s interest in the life of the unborn child isn’t triggered until 22-24 weeks based on viability. The Mississippi case is tailor-made for the high court to revise the threshold based on information such as sonograms and medical advancements not available before. Some may have been surprised when an appeals judge appointed by President Reagan sided with abortionists.

“States may regulate abortion procedures prior to viability so long as they do not impose an undue burden on the woman’s right, but they may not ban abortions. The law at issue is a ban,” Judge Patrick Higginbotham of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reportedly said.

Although his language appears infused with left-wing political speak, he was right to follow the precedent set by Roe and allow the high court to decide a new standard. Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch and others inside the legal community view the Supreme Court’s review of this case to indicate a “viability” amendment.

“This case remains an ideal vehicle to promptly resolve both that question and the first question presented — the contradictions in this Court’s decisions overuse of ‘viability’ as a bright line for measuring pro-life legislation,” A.G. Fitch reportedly stated.

Many legal scholars see this as a potential landmark case that will strike the first of a thousand paper cuts toward overturning the Roe v. Wade decision that effectively codified a genocide of the unborn. Needless to say, Joe Biden’s radical handlers have no intention of sitting idly by as Planned Parenthood abortion clinics lose money.

The Biden Administration already empowered a “Supreme Court Commission” to intimidate the nine justices. Proposals range from packing the court with liberals to limiting tenure have been floated to bring the six conservative justices to heel. Given they took up the Mississippi case, it seems they aren’t exactly trembling in their robes over Joe Biden. One futile, last-ditch effort would be to make Roe v Wade into a federal law while Democrats hold majorities. That position was recently confirmed.

“The president is committed to codifying Roe,” White House Press Secretary “Circle Back” Jen Psaki reportedly said. “Regardless” of the “outcome of this case.”

Like so many maneuvers by Democrats, such as law would promptly be overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court should it agree with the 15-week viability standard set in the Mississippi law.