Now that former President Barack Obama’s liberal activists posing as impartial justices on the U.S. Supreme Court find themselves in the minority, it appears the monstrous Roe v Wade and other abortion decisions will be rolled back.
Former President Donald Trump placed three even-handed jurists to the high court that tipped the balance back in favor of “original intent” interpretations of the U.S. Constitution. The court’s willingness to take up a major abortion-related case now indicates a long-overdue amendment to precedent could be at hand.
Democrats and the fake news media have falsely claimed the U.S. Supreme Court created a right to abortion or, as they claim, “a woman’s right to choose.” What the court actually stated was that people have a right to privacy regarding medical decisions and the state’s interest in the fetus wasn’t powerful enough until viability outside the womb. Given such decisions are based on scientific data as far back as the 1970s, much has changed.
Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant signed a law that effectively banned most abortions after 15 weeks. Under the 1973 Roe v Wade standard, the state’s interest in the life of the unborn child isn’t triggered until 22-24 weeks based on viability. The Mississippi case is tailor-made for the high court to revise the threshold based on information such as sonograms and medical advancements not available before. Some may have been surprised when an appeals judge appointed by President Reagan sided with abortionists.
“States may regulate abortion procedures prior to viability so long as they do not impose an undue burden on the woman’s right, but they may not ban abortions. The law at issue is a ban,” Judge Patrick Higginbotham of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reportedly said.
Although his language appears infused with left-wing political speak, he was right to follow the precedent set by Roe and allow the high court to decide a new standard. Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch and others inside the legal community view the Supreme Court’s review of this case to indicate a “viability” amendment.
“This case remains an ideal vehicle to promptly resolve both that question and the first question presented — the contradictions in this Court’s decisions overuse of ‘viability’ as a bright line for measuring pro-life legislation,” A.G. Fitch reportedly stated.
Many legal scholars see this as a potential landmark case that will strike the first of a thousand paper cuts toward overturning the Roe v. Wade decision that effectively codified a genocide of the unborn. Needless to say, Joe Biden’s radical handlers have no intention of sitting idly by as Planned Parenthood abortion clinics lose money.
The Biden Administration already empowered a “Supreme Court Commission” to intimidate the nine justices. Proposals range from packing the court with liberals to limiting tenure have been floated to bring the six conservative justices to heel. Given they took up the Mississippi case, it seems they aren’t exactly trembling in their robes over Joe Biden. One futile, last-ditch effort would be to make Roe v Wade into a federal law while Democrats hold majorities. That position was recently confirmed.
“The president is committed to codifying Roe,” White House Press Secretary “Circle Back” Jen Psaki reportedly said. “Regardless” of the “outcome of this case.”
Like so many maneuvers by Democrats, such as law would promptly be overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court should it agree with the 15-week viability standard set in the Mississippi law.
If the Democrats knew for sure that these babies would be voting for them, they would make it the law that NO ABORTIONS could ever be performed.
I would bet that if they ruled on this one that would change any thing, they would definitely try to pack the Supreme Court.
Given not only the Supreme’s (and all lower courts) abdication of duty during the 2020 election disgrace, I wouldn’t put much faith on their upcoming attention to the Roe v Wade matter.
In this article, the Supremes are cited as not being in fear of Joe Biden. I think they are sending feint smoke signals on a cloudy and overcast day. (i.e. Nobody’s listening)
It’s not Sleezy, Slow Uncle Joe whom they need to fear. Pelosi and Schumer have the hard on bent to weaponize the Federal and Supreme courts into Democrat extensions of the legislature. If Manchin – D, (WV) and Sinema – D (AZ) cave to the pressure and the filibuster falls, then it might be game over.
On the other hand, if Manchin and Sinema hold, then it will be the turncoat RINO’s we need to be concerned about. Think about it. Cheney is now the scorned Republican who will turn in a heartbeat. (She voted to impeach Trump in the 2nd round.) Mitt Romney surely can’t be trusted as well. He voted to impeach Trump on one article in the 1st round. Other GOP RINOs to watch are Ben Sasse, (NE) and John Cornyn (TX).
Mitch the turtle claims to have all his GOP votes under control. Believe that and we can offer a nice bridge to sell for cheap in the Mohave desert.
You are correct, they only think of winning and power no matter what the cost. If the Supreme Court fails to protect the unborn then they’ll have a rude awakening when Jesus sends them to hell, because they forgot the 5th COMMANDMENT:” THOU SHALT NOT KILL”….that is for all humans God created with a purpose. Can you imagine killing a breathing child with a suction or a knife? That breathing fetus is a human and not an animal. Any Justice who sides with evil will be doomed, because it is in their power to change the killings of millions of babies. Murdering even a criminal sends one to jail or even the gas chamber, how much more an innocent baby created by God with a purpose?
Fortunately, Liz Cheney is not in the Senate. Romney and Sasse will always give true conservatives reason for concern, but Cornyn (while being weak and RINOish at times) will ultimately be okay on tough issues because he has Texas voters who will hold him accountable.
If any of their recent decisions are any indication of where they stand then no, RvW is safe and sound.
Roe vs Wade is UNLAWFUL as it is based on PERJURY!
Roe vs Wade is ANTI-CONSTITUTIONAL, as the US-Constitution and Bill of Rights keep the RIGHT TO LIFE sacrosankt!
Reckless wymin’s convenience and political whim cannot kill unborns and their HUMAN RIGHT!
I agree
They will get right on it, after they correct the Dred Scott decision.